Are the two necessarily mutually exclusive, or is there a happy medium at which the two might come together for the good not only of society but also of the individual? Might it not be to the individual's benefit, and support his or her rights as a human, for societies or a society that can to provide as much of the following as possible: water, food, shelter (including necessary clothing and equipment), education, and health care? These are the things upon which a society prides itself for providing; it's for the social (greater) good, because it makes each individual happier, healthier, and more naturally productive. In those ways it also works for the individual well-being. I feel (for what it's worth) like the issue arises not in the provision of these things to every human being we can reach, but in trying to enforce a 'code of use'. Money given must be given freely, without strings, because the giver can afford it. A government's job is to see to the well-...